This is what it looks like; now you know why "reality-based" is in sarcasm quotes here. It's shocking that more has not been made of John Holdren's
shoddy scholarship and detachment from
actual reality. I'd like to think that at some point in time, someone will bother to ask him how he can possibly expect to be a credible Science Adviser to the President when his past is replete with faulty assumptions, judgments and predictions. If he were a nominee of a
Republican President, the airwaves and Internet would be bombarded with such questions.