SectionsRecent Posts
Blogroll
|
The Malignant Effects Of Being Granted A Quasi-MonopolyPosted by Pejman Yousefzadeh on Sun Apr 27, 2008 at 04:22:07 PM EST
The BBC is a taxpayer funded service in Great Britain. To get Beeb service, one must pay the necessary tax or else, one's television watching is curtailed, to say the least. And what are the effects of this quasi-monopoly status?
Well, this:
Last Sunday wasn't the most eventful one in world history. But it wasn't short of news either. In the United States, the Democratic infighting takes a dramatic new twist with Senator Obama's guns-and-religion gaffe. In Britain, there was open talk of Labour disenchantment with Gordon Brown, the party's prime minister. In Italy, a general election looked likely to bring Europe's most colourful politician to power. In Africa, regional leaders chose to sit on their hands as Robert Mugabe's thugs clubbed their way to keeping him in power, yet again. Food riots in Haiti symbolised the soaring price of the world's basic grains. In Washington, top officials of the seven leading economies gave grim warnings about the credit crunch. To be sure, the article notes that other editorials rushed in as well, but this is what happens when an institution is largely protected from competition by government safeguards. It gets lazy and complacent and standards go out the window. I like a fair amount of the BBC's coverage and Stephen Hugh-Jones does a commendable job of giving credit where it is due. Imagine how much better the BBC would be if it was actually subject to the kind of market competition that other news services must contend with as well.
The Malignant Effects Of Being Granted A Quasi-Monopoly | 0 comments ( topical, 0 hidden)
|
Our SponsorSearchOur Sponsor:DonateOur Sponsor: |