Sections
Recent Posts
- Sunday March 15th
- So Much For The Post-Partisan Era (7 comments)
- Saturday March 14th
- Heartbeat Away, Folks (1 comments)
- The Incredible Shrinking President (2 comments)
- The Quasi-Cuban/Venezuelan Airbase Crisis (1 comments)
- Suddenly, We Have Nothing To Fear But Fear Itself (1 comments)
- And The Scales Fall From The Eyes Of The American Progress (1 comments)
- If You Are Wondering Where The Content From The Past Week Went . . . (0 comments)
- Friday March 13th
- Wow (2 comments)
- Quote Of The Day (0 comments)
- Yet Another Treasury Department Nominee Withdraws . . . (0 comments)
- Older Stories...
Blogroll
- Armavirumque--The New Criterion's Blog
- Stephen Bainbridge
- The Becker-Posner Blog
- Tim Blair
- Stuart Buck
- The City That Eats
- The Corner
- Daniel Drezner
- Jessica Doyle: The Author of Much
- Hit and Run
- How Appealing
- InstaPundit
- Legal Theory Blog
- Libertarian Samizdata
- Lileks
- Marginal Revolution
- The New Ledger
- OxBlog
- Virginia Postrel
- Power Line
- Protein Wisdom
- The Protocols of the Yuppies of Zion
- Red State
- ScrappleFace
- Adam Smith Institute
- Terry Teachout
- Two Blowhards
- VodkaPundit
- The Volokh Conspiracy
- Armed And Dangerous
- The Belgravia Dispatch
- Class Maledictorian
- Hugh Hewitt
- Iowahawk
- Just One Minute
- KausFiles
- Little Green Footballs
- Damian Penny
- Real Clear Politics--Blog Page
- Joshua Trevino
- Michael Totten
- Dr. Weevil
- Winds of Change
For The Record . . .
Posted by Pejman Yousefzadeh on Mon Feb 20, 2006 at 04:43:46 PM EST
If Wal-Mart really did "distribute a statement to bloggers," I am afraid that it means I am off their distribution list. I just decided to write what came to my head regarding the Wal-Mart article found in the Times and that meant raising some questions about some of the suggestions that the Times piece appeared to be making. This is how the creation and publication of original commentary works and I imagine that a lot more people than yours truly decided to go the original commentary route in writing about the Times piece.
It may be a good idea to actually engage critiques of the piece rather than speculating without any foundation whatsoever as to whether Wal-Mart distributed some kind of statement. That's just my old-fashioned view on the situation, but I can't believe it doesn't have some popular currency about it.
| < Aha! So That Is Why The Anti-Pork Barrel Movement Has Failed! | The Great Chicago Steakhouse > |
For The Record . . . | 0 comments ( topical, 0 hidden)
Search
Donate
