SectionsRecent Posts
Blogroll
|
Incomprehensible AliensPosted by sammler on Wed Feb 15, 2006 at 12:14:27 PM EST
[Contains spoilers for Old Man's War, and maybe some David Brin novels.]
I finally got around to reading John Scalzi's Old Man's War, of which this is not a review. It illustrated what I think is a pattern of intellectual laziness and inconsistency in the science-fictional treatment of religion. This is not a particular failing of Mr. Scalzi's, but he provides a ready example.
In Old Man's War, as in David Brin's sequence of space operas beginning with Startide Rising, humanity attains interstellar travel only to find itself in a universe crowded with largely hostile aliens. A version of King Kong in which the monster collapsed under his own weight and slowly died of a punctured lung would not make a gripping story. Similarly the aliens' behavior must be, shall we say, game-theoretically suboptimal, lest we end up with a novel about Pareto optimality and Nash equilibria. The novelist must decide how to make this suboptimality plausible to the reader. Mr. Brin produced what appears to be the canonical solution to this dilemma: the aliens are irrational because they're all crazy religious freaks! This implausible solution has been adopted wholesale by Mr. Scalzi. At least he does not follow Mr. Brin, who makes it doubly bizarre by also silently assuming that humanity will "outgrow" religion as a matter of course during its own progress to the stars. Aliens might be incomprehensible -- like the insectile, monadic robots of Stanislaw Lem's The Invincible -- without invoking the unconvincing mantra of religion. Conversely, religious humans might appear comprehensible, or even logical, to one willing to take seriously the tenets of faith. It might be worth doing.
Incomprehensible Aliens | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 hidden)
Incomprehensible Aliens | 1 comment (1 topical, 0 hidden)
|
SearchDonate |