A Chequer-Board of Nights and Days

48 Hours Later Still the Wrong Nominee

Posted by Leon H on Wed Oct 05, 2005 at 11:27:28 AM EST

Cross Posted: RedState

United Press International July 8, 1981, Wednesday, AM cycle

Copyright 1981 U.P.I.

United Press International

July 8, 1981, Wednesday, AM cycle

SECTION: Washington News

BYLINE: By WESLEY G. PIPPERT

DATELINE: WASHINGTON
In Texas, television evangelist James Robison expressed his support for Mrs. [Sandra Day] O'Connor based on a conversation Tuesday with presidential counselor Edwin Meese.
A Robison aide said Meese told the evangelist:

''Sandra O'Connor thinks abortion is abhorrent and is not in favor of it. She agrees with the president on abortion. There was a time when she was sympathetic toward the ERA (Equal Rights Amendment) movement, but the more she studied and found out about it, the more she changed her mind.
''She is very conservative ... Sandra O'Connor assured the president that she was in agreement with him and she totally supports pro-family issues and the Republican platform.''

In case you're wondering whether the last 48 hours have made me forget the last 24 years, they haven't. It's still foolhardiness to me to blindly support a President, any President, when he says to "just trust him," or to rely on the supposedly held personal beliefs of the nominee. The fact is that judicial philosophies do and ought to matter, especially for someone who will be ruling from the bench.

Furthermore, I still haven't been convinced that this President has done anything to convince me that he deserves my trust as a conservative. Dan Flynn had a brilliant piece yesterday that I'd encourage all of you to read which encapsulates much of what I've been feeling over the last two days:
A man who lacks convictions can't betray them. This is why crying "betrayal" at President Bush's nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court falls flat. Let us instead look in the mirror and see who, after five years of the Bush presidency, has really betrayed conservative principles.
 
When candidate Bush vowed to make education his top federal priority, and to provide prescription drugs for seniors at state expense, conservatives reassured themselves, and others, that these were mere campaign promises. When President Bush did what he promised to do, conservatives sought to mute criticism lest it help the Democrats in 2004. When candidate Bush characterized McCain-Feingold campaign-finance reform as unconstitutional, and mocked "nation building" in his debates with Al Gore, conservatives applauded. When he signed McCain-Feingold into law, and embarked upon mammoth nation-building ventures, we didn't boo.

One could just as easily cite President Bush's nationalization of airport security, the farm, energy, and transportation bills, plan to grant amnesty to illegal aliens, unprecedented federal financing of embryonic stem-cell research, support for affirmative action, and grandiose vision of placing men on Mars to illustrate the point. If President Clinton had attempted any of this, would we have responded in the same quiet manner? All of this leads one to wonder if the raison d'etre of the conservative movement is no longer limited, Constitutional government, but non-stop electioneering to keep Republicans in power. Power is not an end but a means.


Principles lost are difficult to recover. After selling out our principles for the president's benefit, we now have the gall to accuse George W. Bush of selling us out? It's not difficult to understand why President Bush felt it politically safe to insult his base by nominating Harriet Miers: no consequences for past assaults on conservative principles results in future assaults on conservative principles. Fool us once, shame on the president. Fool us 137 times, shame on us.

Indeed. I've fallen on my sword for the last time for Bush. He's flat out used up his capital of trust with me, now I demand proof. If the rest of you want to just keep trusting him, go right ahead. I really have no idea what exactly you hope to get for this devotion, given the President's track record, but count me out of this Magnificent Journey. The President goes it alone from here on out, as far as I'm concerned. I won't enable the continuation of this legacy of mediocrity with my support anymore.

There are still good Republicans out there, and I will still work to support them, and reshape the party in their image. Right now, our party is at a crossroads: do we stand for nothing more than constant electioneering to keep Republicans in power, or do we stand for the principles that made us want to vote Republican in the first place? Bush, to me, has become a symbol of the former. I will work for the latter, even if I must work against elected Republicans to do so.
< My Kingdom For A Meaty Argument | What Happens When Panic Overtakes Reason? >
Display: Sort:
Display: Sort:

Search

Login

Make a new account

Donate

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More