A Chequer-Board of Nights and Days

Movie Review--Serenity

Posted by Pejman Yousefzadeh on Sun Oct 23, 2005 at 06:07:45 PM EST

No, I haven't finished watching the Firefly DVD's--one more episode to be watched. But I couldn't wait any longer to see Serenity. And I loved what I saw.

[Warning: Potential Spoilers Ahead!]

The movie brings to a resolution many of the outstanding issues in the Firefly series. We know of the Alliance conditioning that has driven River Tam mad, but we learn of the external experimentation that tormented her psyche--experimentation that represents social engineering run amok and brings about the rise of the Reavers. The tension between Simon and Kaylee is at long last resolved--happily for fans. The tension between Mal and Inara is not yet fully resolved, but by the end, there appears to be a greater understanding between them for the feelings they quite obviously have for one another. And Browncoat fans suffer a heartbreaking loss when they see the fate that befalls the comic relief and the pillar of moral authority on Serenity.

Whether one likes Serenity over the television series will, of course, depend on one's taste. The television series was more humorous and perhaps more flippant (though endearingly so) than is the movie. The movie certainly does not lack for humor, wit and a well drawn set of characters (the Operative is perhaps the best villain I have ever seen--Chiwetel Ejoifor is masterful) and plot (to be sure, the television series helped in this regard). But it is darker. It is significantly more graphic and frightening than some of the things seen on Firefly (I certainly don't mean to say that Serenity is a horror flick). And it is deeply emotional. By the end of the movie, there were viewers who had to wipe away tears. Some of them were my own.

The political element was clear and present. The Alliance is every libertarian-conservative's nightmare. The younger River calls it "meddlesome" and castigates the Alliance for "telling people what to think." The response by her teacher that the Alliance does not tell people what to think, only how to think, is hardly reassuring. The social experimentation that brought about the Reavers and the rightfully negative commentary on it can be understood as an attack on the belief that social engineering and "meddlesome" policy can lead to human perfectability--"a world without sin" as the Operative puts it. The entire Firefly series can, of course, be plausibly and readily understood as an endorsement of libertarianism. Serenity takes matters up a notch with the presentation of a crisis and discover of great gravity and importance and the characters respond with equally great nobility in an eloquent expression of the finest sentiments of libertarianism mixed with personal virtue. Tired of running and hiding, Malcolm Reynolds resolves to take on the Alliance and to stake his ground on letting as many people as possible know of the Alliance's depraved policies. His crew follows him and puts their lives and fortunes at stake--a group of quasi-legal commercial operatives decide that Fate has called upon them to be heroes and respond to the call with heroism entirely worthy of the occasion. There is death. There is love. And there is great bravery and devotion to a beautiful principle. It may not be "Plan A," but Malcolm Reynolds--the ultimate cynic even given his idealistic libertarian inclinations--is prepared to die so that the signal is not stopped. There is a cause larger than oneself. By believing in it and by fighting for it, both the cause is ennobled and then self is served and made stronger.

Coincidentally, after the movie, I went and bought myself a new coat. You can guess the color. 

< Didn't I Just Say This? | Win Some, Lose Some >
Display: Sort:
two problems with the film (none / 0) (#1)
by Anonymous Hero on Mon Oct 24, 2005 at 10:08:14 AM EST

I very much enjoyed Serenity, but I had two problems with the film:

 

1.  They never explain "two by two, hands of blue", the people chasing River (we see them in "Ariel", an episode in the series).  We do find out who's after her, but the blue-handed people were not in the film.

 

2.  In the beginning of the film, the long master-shot of Mal walking through the ship, talking to everyone, was a somewhat-annoying way to show that they had built a full, connected set of the ship.  They hadn't done that in the show -- the special features showed that the sets weren't necessarily connected "properly" -- so I guess Whedon wanted to show it off to those of us who care about such things.  I appreciated it, but I didn't see the need for it.

 

Oh, and one other thing -- the ship seemed much colder and more dismal than the warmth of it on the show.

 

Otherwise, I loved it. 



An answer to one of the problems (none / 0) (#2)
by Anonymous Hero on Mon Oct 24, 2005 at 10:40:19 AM EST
An answer for one of the problems:

The blue-hands guys were addressed in the comic books, which are a 3 part story bridging the gap between the end of Firefly and the Serenity.

blue hands? (none / 0) (#3)
by Anonymous Hero on Mon Oct 24, 2005 at 12:39:06 PM EST

Comic books?

 

HEY THERE'RE COMIC BOOKS!

 

I could not find it at Barnes & Noble or Amazon, any sources? 



[ Parent ]
Serenity Comic Books (none / 0) (#4)
by Anonymous Hero on Mon Oct 24, 2005 at 02:14:15 PM EST
Check your local comic book store.  They were published by Dark Horse this summer, and while I have seen no announcement of such, I'm sure there will be a graphic novel compilation. http://www.darkhorse.com/profile/profile.php?sku=10-755 



[ Parent ]
Serenity TPB - January 2006 (none / 0) (#5)
by Anonymous Hero on Mon Oct 24, 2005 at 05:10:04 PM EST

I followed the link above, and after a bit of poking around I discovered that there is a Serenity trade paper back coming out in January.

 http://www3.tfaw.com/gn/profile.html?cart=5297675798094044&SKU=10759



[ Parent ]
Serenity (none / 0) (#6)
by Anonymous Hero on Tue Oct 25, 2005 at 04:04:58 AM EST
It's ironic that you say the series is (or to be precise, can be read as) an endorsement of libertarianism.  Whedon actually says that in real life he disagrees with just about everything that comes out of Mal's mouth.  Which I suppose is a tribute to just what a good artist he is--he is so committed to the integrity of the character and the plot that he follows its logic faithfully to tell a story that dramatizes views he doesn't share.  Rare indeed.

As for the comment above about the long tracking shot:  In the Visual Companion (also source of the comment referred to above), it is explained that the point of this shot is twofold.  One, after the opening sequence in which one is presented with and then suddenly pulled out of one false perspective after another, this shot helps the viewer to feel that the ship Serenity is by contrast a real solid place that can be trusted.  Two, the shot follows Mal in his interactions with the rest of the crew, thus establishing him as the main character after River hands off our attention to him.  In any case, I don't see why one would object to something so beautifully done.

Now here's my pet peeve, if anyone has a response.  Why exactly is it that the Reavers don't rape and kill each other until there are none left?  If they have been made to become so uncontrollably aggressive, how can they cooperate with one another enough to keep spaceships in flight and set sophisticated booby traps? 

Display: Sort:

Our Sponsor

Search

Login

Make a new account

Our Sponsor:

Donate

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Our Sponsor: